The Reason They’re Called Hoodies
link Hoodies evolution from fashion mainstay to symbol of injustice – CNN.com.
People can say what they want, but appearance counts. It’s amazing how people still think that their manner of dress expresses their ‘individuality’, when in reality, it is the exact opposite. For most people, what they wear is mainly a function of how they wish to fit into mainstream society, or at least to the subgroup that they find important to them. In other words, it’s all about individuality…in a me too kind of way.
The entire foundation of the fashion industry is predicated upon the notion that the consumer is a ‘certain kind of person’ if only they wore that particular company’s goods. They base their message on the universal frailty that is human insecurity. Fashion is seldom about utility, it is always about conveying an implied message to others. Let’s face it, if it was about utility, we’d all be wearing togas.
Instead we have millions of people willing to pay sometimes hundreds of dollars to buy …jeans. As if wearing a $300 pair of jeans will confer to the wearer any more prestige than would a $20 pair of Costco jeans. What it really says is that someone is dumb enough to pay $300 for some cotton denim that a laborer in a third world country made for $2. The same applies to running shoes. We see instances of kids who can’t possibly afford the latest Nikes but somehow manage to get them.
The ubiquitous hoodie has come into the spotlight recently because of events surrounding the shooting of a teen in Florida. All of a sudden, the wearing of a hoodie is a political statement, even more than it was before. Hoodies have been around for quite a while, long having been the favorite garb of monks. Monks were supposed to be ascetics, so by definition, their clothing had to be the simplest of garb. The hood served a couple of purposes: one, it eliminated the necessity of wearing hats, an extra cost item and two, monks tended to live in colder climates so a hood was useful to keep off the damp cold.
In the past 20 years, despite the onset of global warming, the hoodie has become quite the fashion item, found in the closets of probably most people, especially the younger crowd. No doubt, the popularity of this ‘half snuggli’ has been pushed by many in the entertainment space who are often seen wearing them in their delightful music videos. And because their artistic heroes wear them, the fan base emulates them as well. This is all fine and makes sense unless you happen to not live in Detroit, Chicago or New York. In places like Florida or LA for example, wearing a hoodie is as practical as a fur parka.
Instead, it’s a fashion statement much like wearing a ball cap sideways or pants below crack level. It implies membership in a culture that glorifies all that is associated with that manner of dress. Sixty years ago, this would have been the black leather bike jacket as kids identified with the outlaw persona of Brando or Dean. Without question wearing a black bike jacket was meant to convey a message to others, that you were somehow this outlaw guy, a message that is of course desired by the wearer. Similarly today, unless you’re a monk, wearing a hoodie with the hood pulled over your head is not just a fashion statement, it’s a message sent to others about who you are and your values.
Unfortunately, that manner of wearing hoodies is popular among bank robbers, gangsta rappas and other unsavory types. So when otherwise normal kids copy that style, they are unwittingly lumping themselves in with this group. Like it or not, the wearing of head covered hoodies has negative associations in our society. They may as well be wearing striped crew necked shirts with eyemasks like the Hamburgler. It has nothing to do with freedom of attire. It has everything to do with identifying yourself as part of a segment of popular culture. Unfortunately, this particular aspect of popular culture carries with it connotations of thuggery, no different than a mohawk haircut.
You can’t tell people what to wear, but people should not complain if what they choose to wear elicits responses from others that are not sympathetic. People have the right to appear unsociable and all gangsta, but it’s axiomatic that others have the right to treat them appropriately as well. If you don’t want to be chased by cats, don’t dress like a rat.
Personally I don’t like wearing a hoodie because it musses my hair but it has become an acceptable dress code, albeit for casual dress only. Haven’t seen formal or semi-formal wear incorporating hoodies although some women do wear capes with hoods. Not so sure I agree that hoodies equates with “unsociable” and “gangsta”. When Bill Belechick, coach of the New England Patriots is allowed to wear a hoodie on the sidelines this makes it acceptable to the masses because you know the NFL would crack down on it if they felt it was not in the best interest of the league. Now Belechick may be unsociable but not gangsta.
Coach Belichick, while not a fashion toadie, can be excused for wearing his athletic gear in the context of sport. Gillette Stadium is an outdoor venue, so arguably he is wearing his hoodie against the elements. In the case of many of today’s youth fashionistas, not only do they wear their hoodies hood up in warm climates such as LA, Phoenix, Florida etc, they also wear them that way INSIDE buildings. I’m not convinced banks would love to see gaggles of hoodied men in their foyers.
Bill wears a tuque on occasion with the hoodie over it. I believe it’s his way of looking different and he possibly is trying to set a trend of sloppy dressing. Just imagine what Tom Landry or Hank Stram would say of Bill’s attire.
as long as he doesn’t loiter around 7-Elevens, he’s fine….