As IF Times

Recently, revelations about the number and efficacy of vaccines taken by people have finally been called to question.  For several generations, vaccines of all kinds were foisted on the public, who generally acquiesced to the ‘wisdom’ of the medical industry.  The Covid nonsense woke up the public and suddenly the revelation that children were obliged to take, in some cases over 72 vaccines as compared to only about 4 in the early 60’s, came under renewed scrutiny.  These statistics are sobering.  Populations become de-sensitized to the abnormal.

We’ve become acclimatized to other things as well. It occurred to me that a big chunk of our modern lives is consumed with maintaining records or logs of some kind with all kinds of organizations, without us even realizing it. Everyone and I mean everyone in the world (with access to a smartphone or computer) is obliged to maintain a password of some kind. Losing or forgetting this password leads to all kinds of inconveniences and aggravation disrupting our daily lives.  That’s the least of it.

In reality, to function in today’s society, there are passcodes and checks on every aspect of our lives.  Banking; Netflix; Spotify; Amazon; health clubs; loyalty cards; government services; airlines; etc. etc.   My own survey reveals that I need passcodes to enter over 100 different sites and services. We become indoctrinated to believe that this is just part of life.

Even going to McDonald’s these days can be an IQ test, since there are often electronic kiosks to enter your order in place of communicating with a real person.  You are prompted for your membership identity first.  Someone decided that having machines with member requirements were more efficient than telling a human that you want a big mac. Let’s not even mention the byzantine hoops of government websites and services one has to navigate if you want some kind of government agency information.  May God have mercy on anyone who is the subject of a government clerical error on a form that needs to be fixed.

But those are just nuisance inconveniences. The real oppression comes in the form of fees, taxes and costs… simply to exist.  A quick Google search reveals that the average American pays over 97 distinct taxes including of course, the hated income and property taxes.

From the time you are born, there are fees and costs for you to exist.  Someone has to pay for the hospital costs and I understand that there is even a movement to implement a ‘birthing tax’ on newborns. From that point forward, your entire life is spent in pursuit of making enough money to pay taxes and fees just to be a human.  A massive lucrative industry exists just to guide people on how to keep the money they earn and shield themselves from taxes.  Nowhere else in the animal kingdom are animals required to pay just to live.  If you are fortunate enough to have anything left to leave to your family after a lifetime of paying taxes, then surprise, surprise, there are death and estate taxes.

All of this is tied to the exponential reach and growth of government over our lifetimes. If I wanted to enumerate all the taxes and fees that have been introduced in the past 50 years, it would be an exhaustive list and not really the point of this discussion. Suffice to say, you’d be hard pressed to cite a case of a removal of any given tax or fee once implemented.  Thus, taxes tend to stack up like vaccines doses as people accept them without questioning them.

People have now become accustomed to the mountain of taxes and fees foisted upon them without adequate justification.  It’s accepted as the cost of living. It’s like the new normal of 20% minimum tipping at restaurants. People may complain, but they go along to get along. Never ending taxes and fees are like parasites eating at the body, subtly but surely.   Politicians know this innately.  They will never have the pressure of having to justify their spending bills because public pushback is tepid and passing.  What’s more, they have the ability to vote themselves raises…because of the price increases that they cause.  Thus, people’s fight for simple existence is really against those supposedly charged with their care!

In the animal world, most creatures have to worry about the dangers posed by other species for their survival.  Only in the human world is the most dangerous animal their own species, slowly pecking them to death without them even being aware.  The best analogy is the one about the frog being unknowingly boiled in increasingly warmer water.  It seems as if humans are in a lot of hot water.

It’s bizarre to even think of having a discourse about this, but given the events in the world today, the topic begs to be discussed.

The topic is: What is common sense?

Empirically, the meaning of ‘common sense’ is:  sound and prudent judgement based on a simple perception of a given situation or facts.  At its most basic level, the application of common sense is one of the most important attributes which allow for one’s survival, beyond the normal 5 sensory ones that we all possess.  Even in the animal world, common sense is a natural survival mechanism allowing for the avoidance of unsafe situations.

While most everyone has some innate level of common sense, it’s also true that this skill is developed over a lifetime, based largely in part to unpleasant experiences.  Some achieve common sense the easy way by listening to people with actual life experience, such as parents or close friends.  Others have to acquire common sense the hard way, through personal experience, often bad ones.

Regardless of how it’s acquired, over a lifetime, one accumulates a storehouse of knowledge which presumably directs one away from undesirable activities, which would have led to undesirable consequences.  Those that choose to ignore common sense and pursue some course of action despite warnings are seen as somewhat lacking in intellectual capacity.  Ultimately, common sense is all about maintaining self preservation.

It’s also true that for most people, their perceptions of the world around them and by reflection, their own self worth in that world is dictated by their place in that world.  Numerous psychological thinkers such as Philip Zimbardo, B.F. Skinner, Jean Piaget and Ivan Pavlov have described in their work the tendencies of humans and their behaviors in a social context.  What we have learned from these studies is that humans are quite malleable in their views and even in the case of things that are contrary to ‘common sense’.

In our modern world, two great influences are at play.  Firstly, the sheer amount of information that is available to people is at a level never before seen in history.  Access to information and knowledge in any domain is virtually unlimited. Logically, this vast amount of information should augment whatever level of common sense is in our warehouses.  On the surface, one could assume that this leads to an intelligent and rational society.

Bizarrely, the other great influence at work are the outlets that specifically reject the notions of ‘common sense’ and thus propagate narratives that are clearly at odds with what are observable, concrete facts.  Among the most blatant is the ‘debate’ over gender.  We’re seeing this carried out at all levels now as the narrative being pushed is that gender is a  social and mental construct, not a natural one.  You would think that this is the easiest issue to dismiss out of hand because of, well, common sense.  But in fact, the heated and pervasive battles over defining gender has escalated to the point where politicians have had to create rules demanding that the views of gender deniers receive appropriate consideration in society.  Thus, we are at this point in history that we should ignore all common sense built up over thousands of years and accept that 2 distinct genders has been a false narrative.  That’s quite an error to make for all that time.  Odd that it took so long for someone to notice.

If the most elementary of observations about the human condition can be made to be ambiguous, what chance do other issues of significance have for the public mind?  Most people who have lives don’t really have the chance to delve into the nuances of major political issues.  Thus, they fall on the views espoused by media talking heads and such views become their views.  Thus everyone will consider their views independant….in a me too kind of way.  Ask anyone about their views on Climate change, vaccines, urban crime, foreign wars, price inflation and their major source of information will be popular news outlets which of course parrot the narratives by political sources.  The champions of these causes defy all common sense in their narrative and their actions and yet, they continue to be paraded as experts.  *Cough cough*, John Kerry, Greta Thunberg..

Most if not all of the narratives pushed by media outlets have been disproven by empirical and measurable observations, but once entrenched in peoples’ minds, they cannot be dislodged especially if continuously pushed by media and ‘authorities’.   The wearing of masks and vaccinations are a recent example. We had discussed previously the famous psychology experiments by Solomon Asch in which he demonstrates the pressure of conformity among people.  The most notable experiment was replicated more vividly in an episode of the TV show Candid Camera in 1962. To summarize, a subject entering an elevator encounters all of the occupants facing towards the rear of the car.  Not wanting to stand out, the subjects also decided to face rearward as well.

But all hope is not lost as some lament.  A conclusion by James Surowiecki in his book, “The Wisdom Of Crowds”, points out that Asch notes;

“….that while people slip into conformity with striking ease, it also doesn’t take much to get them to snap out of it. Asch demonstrated this in a series of experiments, planting a confederate to defy the crowd by engaging in the sensible, rather than nonsensical, behavior. That, it turned out, was just enough. Having just one peer contravene the group made subjects eager to express their true thoughts…”

And Surowiecki concludes by noting that, “….Ultimately, diversity contributes not just by adding different perspectives to the group but also by making it easier for individuals to say what they really think. […] Independence of opinion is both a crucial ingredient in collectively wise decisions and one of the hardest things to keep intact. Because diversity helps preserve that independence, it’s hard to have a collectively wise group without it.”

Hopefully, it’s time that people started facing the front of the elevator.