As IF Times The Anti Fake News

August 14, 2012

Food And Drugs

link Hard drugs just minutes away for Vancouver users, study finds | CTVNews.

It’s been very popular to push the notion that the decades long ‘war on drugs’ is lost and that the vast resources expended to battle the drug problem has been wasted.  No less than 4 previous attorneys generals and local mayors of all political stripes have come out in favour of revising tactics on addressing the drug problem.   Apparently, criminal penalties are not the answer.  Interestingly, this is exactly parallel to the decades long “war on fat” being waged all over North America.  Actually, greater amounts of money have been spent on that on-going campaign than has been spent on the war on drugs.   According to the website DrugSense.org, in the year 2010, $15 billion dollars was spent on the war on drugs (not sure how to validate this) whereas according to Business week, about $40 billion dollars is spent on the diet business every year.  www.businessweek.com/debateroom/archives/2008/01/the_diet_indust.html

While it is not yet criminal to be obese, efforts are being made to legislate what people are allowed to eat.  We have Mayor Bloomberg of New York restricting salt levels and the size of soft drinks for example.  Comprehensive labels are required on all food items describing composition and caloric content.  As if that will dent McDonald’s sales. Let’s not forget the war on drunk driving.  Very few aspects of our modern culture are more heinous than being tagged as a drunk driver, especially if involved in a serious accident causing death.

It’s hard to see how people cannot see the consequences of unfettered social recklessness.   While on the one hand, we all want to be free to do as we please, the fact is, much of that freedom have consequences beyond our fleeting personal gratification.  If people want to pursue recreational drugs, then a libertarian society would say, let ’em.  The problem is that the consequences of such an attitude links to all kinds of undesirable outcomes like a long chain to a heavy ball.  Even without the threat of criminal records or incarceration, the undesirable health effects on the individual and their families is undeniable.  This is not victimless.  Not to mention the assorted undesirables who traffic in people’s misery.

If as a society, we really want people to live and let live, then people should be free to consume what they want without restriction or guilt.   If we’re going to decriminalize something as odious as drug use, then we should certainly stop the sanctimony regarding something as pleasurable as food and let people eat freely.  Why would we spend so much time and money demonizing fat people but be compassionate to drug users?  In the case of obesity, people don’t have the choice of eating or not, the only issue is amount.   At least there’s a social benefit to eating and drinking.  For instance, discovering fine restaurants or touring the wine country has a bit more cachet than a tour of a local meth lab.

The sinister nature of hard drug use is not just wild theory.  It has brought down nations (think Chinese opium wars ) and has destroyed productive lives.  I don’t recall that obesity has ever been the cause of  the wholesale collapse of nations.  With perhaps the exception of Michael Moore, no one is addicted to Big Macs. So it’s amusing that we have various and sundry celebrities and media types calling for the decriminalization of toxic chemicals and in some cases glamorizing the use of them, while we have government sponsored campaigns telling people what and how to eat.  Better fat than fried is my opinion.

In societies of consenting adults, people  should be free to do as they wish to themselves, but they must also suffer the consequences of their stupidity, sort of like skiing out of bounds or windsurfing in a hurricane or voting liberal.  No amount of warning will dissuade adults from pursuing harmful activities.  Think cigarette warnings. Think Barbra Streisand concerts.  But you still have to protect the kids.  Any society that doesn’t protect their kids will wind up having to be protected from them.  If anything, the war on drugs should escalate to deter those preying on kids.  But leave the food alone.

May 26, 2011

Can’t Have Good Without Bad?

Filed under: Culture — Tags: , , , , , , — TC @ 9:07 am

link Tiger Woods out of the World Golf Ranking top 10 for first time since 1997 – News | FOX Sports on MSN.

In order to fix Tiger’s professional woes, nobody seems to want to address the elephant in the room solution.  He’s already gone the conventional route by trying to refine his swing by working with various high profile coaches from Harmon, to Haney and now to Canadian Sean Foley.  No doubt he has access to the best sports psychologists money can buy…and he can buy a lot of them.  For someone who until recently was destined to be the greatest player ever in the game, the lack of production over the last 2 seasons is unthinkable.  In his absence, a whole new flock of aspirants are fighting for his crown of Number 1 in the world.

The simple fix is, why not go back to what worked before?  When he came out in 1997, he lapped the field at the Masters cruising to the largest stroke margin of victory ever.  His swing was good enough then.  Of course we all know now that other things were transpiring in Mr. Wood’s life, things that didn’t play well in the press. 

But maybe that was part of the formula that made him good.  Maybe in his case you can’t have the good without the bad?

Who knows, maybe all that rampant testosterone in his double life also carried over into his professional life and made him the terror to other golfers that he was.  Maybe he needed to have all of those components in his life firing in order to perform at his high level.  This is not to cast admiration or support for his activities, it’s merely an observation.  Maybe he’s like drain cleaner; works well, but wrecks the pipes.

Years ago, McDonalds was the indisputable champion of the french fry business.  People could scoff at the rest of their menu items, but nobody didn’t like McDonalds fries.  They were like crack cocaine to most people.  Then a dark secret was leaked out.  Apparently over the years when they claimed to be using 100% vegetable oil in fry production, McDonalds had actually been using beef tallow or flavoring in their formula.  Lawsuits and moaning ensued and the company was forced to change their oil formula.   After switching to a more ‘healthy’ oil to fry the fries, the taste never became the same.  Sure they continue to sell fries, but the addictive quality of the previous iteration was gone.  Now, other fast food operations like Wendy’s claim the title as best french fry.  Do-gooders claimed victory, but what really should have happened was that people should have chosen not to buy the original fries if they thought they were harmful.  Too simple I guess.  Go figure, they want to legalize pot, but criminalize french fries.

Anyway, getting back to Tiger, the ignominy of his life has already been exposed, the consequences taken and the monies spent.  So now what?  If Tiger wants to play the recovering daddy role, that’s admirable.  But if he wants to regain the fire that put him on top of the golf world when he was younger, he may have to return to the original formula which put him there.  Tiger’s entire existence is owed to golf.  He has to regain the formula. He may be back on the circuit again soon.  And I don’t mean just golf.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress