As IF Times

link:  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/media/article-15036239/morning-joe-chicago-mayor-brandon-johnson-crime-police.html

Anyone paying even the slightest attention to the news is aware of the rampant crime that’s evident in so many large major cities. Though we observe wanton criminal activity in Europe, the most brazen criminal activity occurs in the large cities of the United States.

For the majority of normal people, this is not a good thing. Despite the political bleats of such as Chicago’s mayor Brandon Johnson, most would prefer a safe city where the average number of shootings on a weekend is not close to an average school classroom.  How can this be allowed to happen on a regular basis?

On a frequent enough level to be newsworthy, a ‘mass’ shooting of some kind takes place in the US and the usual tired narratives of gun restrictions surfaces once again. Conveniently ignored is the fact that a large percentage of these shootings are carried out by mentally disturbed people who are coincidently gender confused. It’s as if they blamed shootings on the guns rather than the obvious fact that all the shooters happened to wear a bear costume.  Like blaming the fork instead of the fat guy.

It’s logical that the ‘population’ will demand that the government in charge do something to keep people safe.  In the UK, there have been rumors of food stores soon requiring digital ID to shop in order to protect from criminals who would enter there to rob or create havoc.  You read that right; people will require digital identification to buy food at the stores.  This is their government’s idea of helping the people.  What could go wrong there?

For some reason, this modus operandi reminds me of a very successful business model that has been in place for centuries.  The model is the Mafia. As in, “nice restaurant you have there.  It would be a shame if something were to happen to it.  Why don’t you pay us a regular fee to keep you safe?”

If we step back and reflect upon the authorities’ attempt to restrict people during the last Covid pandemic charade, the steps taken were all about controlling the movements and activities of people. Where you could go, whom you hung out with and what you could do were all dictated by the state because, you know, to keep everyone safe.

You don’t have to be a conspiracy theorist to connect the possible dots on the long range plan for the big cities.  Violence and crime are rampant: citizens will demand action: politicians will decree control measures on everyone, even on your currency. In the nation formerly known as Canada, some of the measures taken to protect the public are straight out of Monty Python.  Some may recall the advice of police regarding car thefts from people’s homes.  Just leave the keys at the front door to make it easier for the thieves.  Recently, a man was charged with aggravated assault for daring to use a knife to fight off intruders in his own home!

People can cluck about the ineffectiveness of politicians; that they don’t know what they’re doing.  But there’s the other possibility….that they know exactly what they’re doing.

link The Associated Press: Obama pledges changes to avert future spills.

Future students of history and civilization will study this last half century period in America and will no doubt be fascinated by the various official responses to national calamities.  In addition to the linked story above is the news that the present Attorney General, Eric Holder is making a personal appearance in the Gulf region presumably to ascertain what legal actions can be taken in the wake of this big oil leak.  The administration has also let it be known that a commission will be organized to investigate what to do and to make more laws.  This makes sense to whom?  A massive engineering problem arises requiring experts from all kinds of technical disciplines to try to resolve and the government sends in…. lawyers???

As if every ailment that affects society has a legal solution. Western society has been conditioned to think that somehow, legal resolutions are the ultimate cure all.  The first instinct for most when some misfortune befalls them is to call a lawyer and why not? This seems to be the civilized way to act in a decent society.  Except that what will ultimately happen is people will tire of the inanity of this mindset and will revolt.  As the current raging rancor over Arizona’s immigration laws demonstrate, people will flout laws anyway if no one is going to enforce them.  Why go to the trouble of engaging shiploads of lawyers to create laws if no one bothers to enforce them?  Is this not just a massive make-work program for lawyers?

The tragically flawed delusion inflicted upon society that somehow lawyers and laws are the salvation of all has reached comical proportions.  Massive oil leak? Send in lawyers. Gas pedal sticking in your Toyota? Call in the lawyers.  A business like Microsoft too succesful? You guessed it, get lawyers involved. As I mentioned in a previous post, just wait for the lawsuits from college graduates who can’t find jobs after spending a small fortune in tuition. 

In direct contradiction to a society that supposedly nurtures self determination and initiative, byzantine and nuisance laws actually discourage human development and impedes the progress of people.  Just today, there is the news story of a woman who is suing Google for giving her map directions which placed her in the middle of a highway where she was injured by traffic, see here: http://www.nydailynews.com/tech_guide/2010/05/31/2010-05-31_lauren_rosenberg_sues_google_blames_faulty_google_maps_directions_after_being_hi.html  Not surprisingly, this woman is from California where the altered state is the preferred state.

This state of delusion has formed a society in which finger pointing is the default response for all events affecting our individual lives.  The gulf oil leak as covered by the media is focused upon legal heads arguing over who’s at fault for the catastrophe.  Apparently the blame reaches all the way to the first Bush administration.  In line with legal tactics, everyone involved with the leak can expect to be found somewhat culpable for the fiasco.  British Petroleum certainly, but what of all the suppliers to the rig site?  What of the providers of steel, of the manufacturers of the drilling machinery?  What of the State or Federal bodies that granted permits for the drilling?  What about the financial institutions that financed the project?  What about the people who provided food to the workers on the rig?  Will they be roped in as well since they ‘enabled’ the drilling to take place?

It appears that we’re well past the point where reams of laws and more importantly, the mentality of the legal system  can be seen to be protecting the people.  We are now well into the stage where the legal requirements governing people’s everyday lives behave more like sand in the gears than the lubricant they should be.  Years ago, a book by a former Jurist, Catherine Crier wrote a book entitled The Case Against Lawyers, which described the many ways in which the law profession was undermining society by creating an unfair legal system.  Onerous laws and regulations are in large part responsible for migration of many core industries to other emerging nations.   Businesses would recoil at the thought of having the Mafia extort protection money from them as a cost of doing business.  Onerous laws and regulations are exactly the same thing, except….who protects us from the lawyers?

The worst part of what has happened is that entire generations of bright minds have been sucked into the lure of the law racket because it  continues to be a lucrative profession regardless of economic cycles.  The consequence is that bright minds have been diverted from doing things that can actually benefit society, in areas of medical research and engineering for example.  As long as people can succeed in life by pointing fingers for a living, that’s unlikely to change.