As IF Times The Anti Fake News

May 7, 2012

Suicide by Legumes

Filed under: Culture — Tags: , , , , , , — TC @ 5:52 pm

link Dinosaurs farted their way to extinction, British scientists say | Fox News.

The implications of this ‘news story’ are mind boggling.   While I am certainly not in a position to scientifically question the astounding conclusion of this study, if these scientists’ claims are valid, some big changes are going to happen to our society.

The very first thing that comes to mind is the concept of being a vegetarian.  As astute readers of the article will notice, most of these behemoth monsters were actually vegetarians, consuming mainly plants and trees, albeit by the acre, Michael Moore-like.  As most consumers of beans and legumes are aware, consumption of such stuff can lead to embarrassing moments in crowded elevators.  Apparently, the dinosaurs had the same issues millions of years ago and they gassed themselves to extinction.  Logically, we can only extrapolate that vegetarian humans are actually harming our present environment and therefore they should be stopped immediately before it’s too late.

If we were able to monitor the air over San Francisco, Los Angeles or Vancouver, there’s a certainty that the air quality would show higher than the normal measures of toxic gases, which we can now trace  to rampant vegetarianism among their populace.  People may be forgiven who had thought that BS emanating from these cities were responsible for the bad air.  Of course, this gas issue is already known by those who are participants in Yoga classes.   They should immediately form an organization called STOP generating annoying smells, or STOP GAS.

If human vegetarians are a menace to society, then so are all herbivores.  For years, there were theories that cows were in fact the greatest contributors to global warming due to their release  of methane gas from eating grass.  Now, the fickle finger of blame is zeroing in on these dangerous animals.  This dangerous list of herbivores will include goats, sheep, deer, elephants and giraffes too.  All of these creatures are hastening the doom of mankind.  It turns out that eating meat is not only tasty, it’s also green and socially responsible!  Eating broccoli is bad after all!

Another implication of this story is that scientists seem to have the ability to discern the cause of events looooong past their occurrence by persistent and ingenious sleuthing.  Even though dinosaurs died off a few million years ago, apparently the cause of their demise is evident even now, as if it were a slightly cold CSI case and the chalk outline was in clear view.  It’s hard to believe that the dinosaur conclusion wasn’t arrived at sooner.  It was right under our noses; all that was needed was to stitch a bunch of seemingly unrelated pieces of evidence together as if it were a Mississippi trial.   This should scare all criminals.  The truth will come out eventually, although perhaps a few million years down the road.  It will only be a matter of time before they apply modern science to unravel some of the true puzzles of modern life; such as the mystery  of Jimmy Hoffa’s disappearance or how they get the caramilk in a caramilk bar.

Facebooktwitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

December 12, 2011

Pain And Suffering

link Hertz to fight Muslim workers suit over prayer breaks | Reuters.

When you read the article, you will notice a standard legal line which we see on a regular basis but which we mostly accept as background noise.

As restitution for the despicable and unreasonable demands of the Hertz company, the aggrieved workers want as part of their settlement, back pay plus damages for emotional pain and suffering.  This little phrase has worked its way into western culture over the past few generations as one of the standard reparation demands in any grievance lawsuit.  In doing some cursory research, there is no definitive record of how this standard restitution came to become part of most damages actions today.  If anyone out there knows, by all means please enlighten me.

Being an evolved and sophisticated society, we no longer practice the eye for an eye stuff stipulated in the Bible and which practice is still adhered to even to this day in numerous Muslim cultures.  The closest western cultures come to retributive justice is the death penalty for certain heinous crimes, but because of the lengthy appeals process, is actually more like the possibility of an eye for an eye, but first,  30 years on death row while we talk about it.

Instead, we substitute the notion that to alleviate whatever mental anguish was suffered by party A as a result of actions by party B, that a transfer of money from the aggriever to the aggrieved would be satisfactory compensation for the insult.  It’s easy to see how this makes sense at some level and in fact every year,  grotesque amounts of money changes hands in furtherance of this principle via tort lawyers, insurance companies, aided by all and sundry types of experts in damages lawsuits.

In many cases, such as the one referred to in the article, the ability to place a dollar value on the extent of the insult is iffy at best.  If the folks described in the article are wanting compensation for the time they were not allowed to pray, divide the hourly rate of pay by the minutes lost to praying and voila, it’s done.  I’d hazard $10 tops.  Any more than that and a case could be made that there was more time spent praying than driving cars around…in which case, Hertz should really hire legitimate workers.

In many other cases, the notion of making someone pay as compensation for some aggrievance, real or imagined has become an end in of itself.  The spectre of having to battle lawyers in both the courts of public opinion as well as the legal courts that are staffed with learned but misguided jurists has contributed mightily to the costs of mostly everything that people consume today from aspirins to x-boxes.

One of the more transparently greedy schemes to extort money in the guise of compensation came recently in a headline from the Durban climate talks.  There was a proposal that the U.N. was to be granted the power to tax or fine nations that exceeded some fanciful metric of climate transgression.  This body is to be named (in an orotund voice) The International Climate Court of Justice, not to be confused with the old Justice League of America. This body would have the power to enforce nations to pay ‘climate debt’.

The lack of logic of this proposal is stupefyingly obvious.  If the climate transgressions are as imminently fatal to the earth as they all claim, what good will transferring money to the U.N. do?  Presumably, this money will go towards alleviating emotional pain and suffering for…well, someone.   If we’re all gonna die because of flatulent cows and aerosol hairspray, why bother moving money around from one pocket to another?  How is having some extra cash going to help you if the seas rise and the atmosphere turns into a solid?  If on the other hand, there were some guarantee that this proposed pool of fine money were to be spent on spaceships to send Global Warming alarmists off to another planet, then I’d be all in favour of the idea.

However, like the Hertz employees, the end game for the Global Warming crowd is the same; it’s just extortion at a larger scale. At the moment at least, the chances of such an outcome are low.  At least I pray it is.

 

 

 

Facebooktwitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
« Newer Posts — Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress