Archive

Posts Tagged ‘David Suzuki’

The End Is Near…Well Soon

March 7th, 2011 No comments

link Worlds sixth mass extinction may be underway: study – Yahoo! News.

Who pays for these studies?  When you are drawn in  by the hysterical headline, you naturally look to see how much time humankind has left.  Is it weeks? Months? Years? Should we put off buying that place in the Desert? Forget about college for the kids?  It turns out that you’d better not stop brushing your teeth.   It’s a wee  bit beyond human years.  Nothing wrong with being prepared, but the best estimates are between 3 and 22 centuries from now. 

-_-

As in 300 to 2200 years.  Sadly, the idiots who did this study won’t be around to smack when their predictions are wrong.  They would have been paid their $$$ to come up with this brilliant study and then be off studying some other urgent calamity, like the sun running out of rays.  But let’s suspend our rationality for a moment and say we believe the results of their thorough and likely expensive study.  The question is, so what?  Do we leave messages in bottles for the great, great, great, great grand kids instructing them that buying real estate is not a good bet?  Should man start funding science programs to escape earth?

On the other hand, if mass extinction is in the cards anyway and mankind is doomed to extinction like dinosaurs and girl bands, then why are we spending any time, money and effort at all on the global warming industry?  Why should western society submit to self flagellation on the behest of those who transparently want a wealth transfer from a gullible society into their sanctimonious control?  How is this different from wise shamans of the ancient Mayan civiliation who believed that human sacrifices would somehow benefit their society?  I’m sure even the sacrificees believed so at the time.  I’ll bet they would be annoyed to learn that their self  sacrifice really didn’t achieve what was promised considering all the convincing rhetoric at the time.  Of course, back in their day, there wasn’t a lot of discourse on what would please the gods.  Somebody said it was so and that was that. 

Try as they might to emulate that kind of blind devotion, the global warming crowd today haven’t quite been able to achieve this, though they’ve come close.  Most rational people have caught on to the charade, but devotees still abound, similar to the faith of the Mayan sacrificees.  Most of these people are east to spot since they all subscribe to ‘the green’ look.  For some reason, a common feature is the crazed, wall eyed look, a la Marty Feldman.  In addition, beards and uncombed hair are also part of the appearance requirements.  The men are even worse.  It’s as if David Suzuki opened a costume shop. 

As the fervor dies down on this mania, we’ll keep an eye out for the next big calamity which will devastate mankind if we don’t tax more to prevent it.  But as the study above shows, we know the big day is really a few hundred or a few thousand years off.

Don’t Be A Hoser Eh.

December 14th, 2010 No comments

link  Wis. Postal Worker Delivers Mail In The Buff « CBS Minnesota – News, Sports, Weather, Traffic, and the Best of Minnesota.

I get asked all the time as to why I write about American experiences when I live up here in Canada.  The short anwer is, because of articles like this.  In the Excited States of America can be found the entire range of human behaviour, beliefs and experiences and a huge collection of nuts.  It is a nation full of extreme opposites, rich and poor, brilliant and vapid, selfless and selfish.  Opinions can be extreme and passions run high.  It is still a nation where individuality matters and is prized.   In the parlance of market statisticians, it is a nation tracing out a huge bell curve with very fat tails.  Canada, on the other hand, having a much smaller population, traces out a much narrower, taller bell curve with very thin tails. 

For other than the 3 of you who knows what that means, it only postulates that we in Canada don’t have the extremes of personalities up here as compared to the U.S.. Despite protestations to the contrary, pressure to conform is much greater here than in the far flung and diverse population of the U.S.  Because we are a smaller population, the influence of the media is much more influential in shaping opinions and values.   As Canadians should realize, if they paused at all to think about it, there really is no variance in the opinions of media outlets, one of which is the nationally owned one.  We don’t have anything similar to a Fox News in Canada.  They’re all variants of the same PC themed formats.  

That’s not to say that we take ourselves too seriously, in fact, it’s the opposite.  The trademark Canadian humor is portrayal of our own dufusness.  Think Bob and Doug Mackenzie of days gone by.  Think Jim Carrey.  Think Dana Carvey.  Think John Candy.  They’re funny, but it’s all the same shtick.

What some may refer to as ‘da Canadian values’ can more realistically be characterized as group think.  Certain behaviours are programmed into people so that they become  a natural reflex.  Recycling for example.   Deference to ‘green’ initiatives, no matter how inane, are universally accepted as inviolable social mandates.  Throw a plastic water bottle into the trash at a party and you become an instant pariah.  Mention that seals are good eats and notice the horrified stares.  Mention that multiculturalism leads to balkanization and watch people moving to distance themselves from you like you had 3 heads. 

Canadians are programmed to fit into the mainstream.  Americans on the other hand seem to have a much larger number of eccentric nuts in their population, people more willing to march to their own drummer,  more willing to do their own thing and express themselves.  Canadians are individualists too some may say.  True, but in a me too kind of way.   Perhaps that in a small way explains the success of so many Canadian entertainers who make their fortune and fame in the U.S..  Someone else can write a PhD thesis on this, my only take is that the American experience is a much richer one when it comes to culture, despite conventional opinion to the contrary.  As much as Canadians smugly claim the banner of tolerance, I think that the Americans by far have a more tolerant population.  As a politician up here, try to address any issue of universal entitlement and you will get  the standard knee jerk charge of  insulting  ‘da Canadian values’ of tolerance, compassion, yada yada yada. 

In the U.S., you can exhibit all kinds of anti mainstream behaviour and not be accused of  insulting American values, unless of course, you are.  Up here, the worst thing you can accuse someone of is not being a recycler.  Americans have no problem criticizing something,  deserved or not.  In Canada, it is considered impolite to criticize anyone.  In the U.S., they call a spade a spade.  In Canada, it’s possibly a shovel, but maybe a rake or can be a small wheelbarrow, whatever the owner thinks it is, is fine.  Canadians are too polite eh.  We hate to rock the boat.

Or are we?  As I referenced earlier on, there are very few media groups controlling all of the product that we see from news to entertainment.  The view that Canadians have of themselves is shaped not so subtly by the values imparted by the influential media.  It’s an homogenized vision of niceness and tolerance.  It’s my opinion, that most people don’t subscribe to the idealized version of  ‘da Canadian values’.  It’s my contention that people collectively groan at the exhortations of media and politicians who purport to reflect ‘da Canadian values’.  It’s just that most people would rather live their lives than be bothered with the chest thumping posturing of the usual publicity gluttons.  I mean really, Michael Ignatieff represents Canadians?  Does everyone agree with David Suzuki?

Case in point.  Only recently, after an extended run as Premier of BC, the leader of the Liberal Party, Gordon Campbell was forced to step down due to sinking popularity.  How could that be?  By most measures, he had managed the Province well and the recent Winter Olympics was his crowning achievement.  The answer is that over the years, numerous contentious policies were enacted into law which satisfied his own ideological bent but which did not have the support of the public.  The public meekly went along and did not voice enough protest.  The final straw was an outright 180 degree turn on a tax policy which was imposed despite explicitly denying it during an election.  On top of all the green taxes, land giveaways and scandals over the years, people finally had enough.  Contrary to what the media says, it wasn’t just the tax that sealed his fate, it was resentment over years of unpopular  ideologically driven policy decisions.  It wasn’t fickleness. If there was popular support for all that he had done in the past, he would have survived the single issue of the tax mis-step.  Obviously there was not.

Canadians will lose their milquetoast reputation when they stop believing the media’s representation of who we are.  We can take a page from the U.S. experience and turf those from office who pretend to know our values and perhaps consider  those with differing voices from the supposed mainstream.  Strong voices and strong opinions.  Then I’ll have some fun things to write about.