Being There Redux
link Peggy Noonan: We Just Dont Understand – WSJ.com.
It ain’t him. It’s the people. When the candidate was first thrust into the larger public eye from the village politics of Illinois, he was immediately acclaimed to have the skill set and accomplishments of someone twice his age and experience. In his own words, the rise of the oceans would slow, the earth would begin to heal yada yada yada. Using a baseball analogy, he was a closer who was also expected to field balls and hit home runs as well. Naturally, he is doomed to failure since he is only good at one small aspect of the game.
Barely two years after the coronation, even the ardent supporters are moving away from their blind support of the incumbent. The 26 people who still watch David Letterman heard his wisecrack about the ‘one term president’ recently. What changed? It’s not as if the job description changed. Put simply, our guy was never qualified for the job in the first place. Without benefit of ANY meaningful business or administrative experience, the complex decisions that have to be considered as leader of the free world has left him floundering because of poor experience and poorer advisers.
A perfect storm of disillusionment with the former President, the enormous influence of Oprah which mobilized an historically quiet demographic, a stalling economy and an extremely partisan media brought someone into office without sufficient scrutiny of his character. Rather, all the various groups that supported his candidacy projected upon him their own versions of what kind of person he was. The 1979 movie, Being There (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Being_There) , featured Peter Sellers as a simple gardener, but was considered by his high society employer as some kind of savant because of his pithy and earthy responses to complex questions, eventually providing advice to the President of the United States. A bitingly satirical movie has turned into real life only decades later.
Lots of barbs have been thrown at the President and that is expected of any politician. Some criticisms are certainly deserved but many criticisms from his own fold are likely projections of disappointment by the people who had unrealistic expectations of his ability. He just happened to be in the right spot at the time. As is now obvious, talking is the easy part; the hard part is the doing. Being there isn’t enough. The President is not responsible for disappointing people; the people can only be disappointed with themselves.