Home > Culture, Politics > They Should Have Banned Fire

They Should Have Banned Fire

December 8th, 2011 Leave a comment Go to comments

link School turns heating off to ‘save planet’ | The Sun |News.

And speaking of morons, the hits just keep on coming.   When people with questionable judgement are placed into positions of power or influence, only grief can ensue.   Surely people such as this headmaster have suffered some kind of physiological injury because there has obviously been a severance of the cord connecting his brain hemispheres.   At the very least, the logic wire has come loose.

If the entire global green movement is to have any credibility at all, they should at least be honest about what the end goals are.  If you follow the string of logic to its ultimate conclusion, the end game is to wipe mankind completely off the planet.  Which is of course, preposterous.  But that’s the only possible way by which all human damage to the planet can be halted.

Who knew that when the first Neanderthal rubbed a couple of sticks together to make a fire that this was the beginning of the end for mankind?   (And they still have the nerve to show their faces on insurance commercials for Geico….shameless ).  From that moment on, it was as if the light bulb went off for mankind as to how to make their existence better.  Now that they discovered how to warm themselves from the elements, it was only a matter of time before cooked food was next.   Fast forward millions of years later and we have New York City.  What the earthies are trying to do is turn the clock back on all of this.  If the green movement is to gain any credibility at all from here, why not just be blunt about what they’re after?  At the moment, they’re pushing the notion of windmills and bicycles, but we all know that’s as likely to last as long as a paycheck in a casino.  To really eliminate any possible scarring of the earths’ delicate eco-system, man has to go.

Do the earthies really think people will resume living in caves, foraging for berries and chasing animals for food?  The entire basis for the existence of all life from amoebas to zebras is the basic struggle of the organism versus the environment.  Survivors adapt, procreate and populate.  Non adaptors get eaten or go extinct.  Some guy named Darwin wrote an article about that at the turn of the century.  The very fact that most humans have developed a superior brain to all other living creatures confers upon them a certain latitude to modify their environment for better living.   There’s no point in having superior reasoning and thinking skills yet still live in the same circumstances as a brown bear in the log hollow just down the path.  That’s preposterous.  That’s why we build condos.

Is the world a better place if people were stripped of their ability to travel, to invent, to mix cultures, to watch football, to eat cooked food?  Look at the tribes living in the African Serengeti Plains.  I don’t see lots of people like Headmaster goofball moving there for the simple life.  This whole save the earth movement should set an example by setting up camp somewhere in Africa and show us all how it’s done…with no internet access.

 

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.