As IF Times

link Stephen Fry: Women don’t really like sex. What would he know, ask feminists | Mail Online.

As they say, opinions are like, well, you know, the thing that everyone has one of.  I won’t pretend to vouch for the veracity of Mr. Fry’s comments since of course, I don’t really know.  While it’s certainly possible that being gay confers upon him some special insight on the wants and needs of women, notably in the area of fashion, it’s a stretch in the area of sexual pleasure.  Certainly, it’s hard to argue against his views in the case of say,  Michael Moore or Mick Jagger.  However Warren Beatty or George Clooney may have divergent views and perhaps we should hear their opioions.   What’s most interesting about this article is, who cares what Stephen Fry thinks and how does his opinion get any press?

In a world of 3 billion plus people, how does an effete whatever he is manage to grab the attention of media which then broadcasts his wisdom for all to consume?  Has this person attained some great feat of discovery?  Does he have a history of providing grist to the collective  intellectual mill.  How did he manage to attain such sage status with his pronouncements that people would stand up and take notice?  Apart from his circle of merry men, who has even heard of this guy before?

The article describes Mr. Fry as ” the cleverest man in Britain” and “one of the country’s most famous homosexuals”  !!! 

Really? How does one get to such an exalted position in society?  Was there a contest or was it simply by selection of his peers? Are there courses you can take in school to prepare yourself for the running for such a position? How does one rise from the pool of merely clever men to the being the cleverest?  Not just the cleverest, but the most famous homosexual as well! 

How does the media decide that such a story is even newsworthy?  Like most newsrooms, I imagine that meetings are held in the mornings to discuss the contents for the coming day.  The war in Afghanistan.  Earthquake in Haiti.  Volcano in Indonesia.  Elections in the U.S.  Riots in France.  But wait!! There’s a proclamation by Stephen Fry! Stop the presses! 

Historians will one day dig up old archives representing glimpses of our society hundreds of years from now.  Among the pieces of old newspapers will be stories of Stephen Fry, one of the sages of his time whose pronouncements were heeded by all.  Da Vinci, Ben Franklin, Marconi, Gandhi and Mother Teresa, mere footnotes in the archives of history.  The evidence will show that the really avant garde thinkers of our time were gay since their opinions were sought after on every aspect of daily living.  Come to think of it, he compelled me write about him.  Boy he IS clever.

link Nick Clegg to denounce Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at UN | Politics | guardian.co.uk.

Good for Nick.  It is curious though that it is someone representing a foreign government and not the Americans directly making the speech denouncing the ravings of statesman Mahmoud in his recent charm offensive.  We all know that politics and diplomacy is all about thrust and parry, maneuvering and feinting.  What is said in public can be intended for very distinct audiences. 

It’s doubtful that what Ahmadinejad had to say would find many sympathizers in the U.S. except perhaps the  911 conspiracy crowd.  These are the same people who insist the moon landing took place on a Universal Studios soundstage, who think Elvis is alive and living at The Villages in Florida and that Stephen Colbert has talent.  

It’s possible that Mahmoud’s words were taken out of context when he says,

“…That some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order also to save the Zionist regime…”

and

“…should the United States attack Iran over its nuclear program, it would become embroiled in a war that would make previous American conflicts pale in comparison…”

It’s more likely that these remarks were aimed at his brothers back in the ‘hood. After all, when you can come right into the bowels of the Great Satan, poke them in the eye and then have them pay and ensure your personal safety, that’s a big win for the home team.  It looks great on your resume and ensures that you will get people to listen to you back in Sandville.  You have to admire the guy for the deft play in the diplomacy field. 

Meanwhile, the Americans showed just how irascible they can be in the face of overt threats.  They walked out of the speech.  Boy, they sure showed him!  It’s one thing to pretend to be accepting of views of tyrants, dictators and other modern day Napoleons of small stature and belligerent egos, but when they basically spit in your  soup and dare you to do anything about it, there should be some indignant response from the aggrieved.  Why wouldn’t the highest representative of the U.S. government stand up forcefully and make a statement that in no uncertain terms excoriates the opinions of the Mahmouds of the world and make it clear that further aggravation will not be tolerated.  Instead of allowing him to come to New York to see a Broadway play, he can stay at home and shake his fists there. 

In this enlightened age of civility, I suppose it would be considered unsociable to set off some devices which would result in mushroom shaped clouds in his neighborhood.  Ok, we can accept that.  But at the very least, when the guy swaggers over here to rail and rant, let security be his own concern.  What do we care if he falls down an open manhole? Let him ride the subway and risk mugging like everyone else.  Given a choice, do U.S. citizens really want to surround our hero with police escorts and security bubbles? Given a choice, I think they’d prefer to listen to their own domestic unshaven nutbar, Michael Moore.  At least the people don’t have to pay for his security.