As IF Times The Anti Fake News

September 4, 2018

Bad Companies

Filed under: Culture,Politics — Tags: , , , , , — TC @ 7:03 am

Source: Colin Kaepernick earns support from diverse chorus, including John Brennan, over Nike ad | Fox News

Many may recall back in our university or college days, that the targets of student antipathy were the large mega- corporations that were ostensibly responsible for inflicting all kinds of ills upon society.  Big oil in particular was seen as evil since they were heartless goliaths that trampled upon the rights and freedoms of the plain folk in their single minded pursuit of the dollar. 

Valid or not, protests against the perceived evils of these large corporations became more common as people use their voices to hold large companies to account for their activities.  To this day, if a rare species of grub may be endangered by a pipeline or a dam, a veritable village  of protesters appears to protest the project and by extension, the company behind it.  The standard pushback was against “the military industrial complex” which was the oppressor of the people.  Today, the issues that get people to wearing masks and holding signs are more bizarre and comical, ranging from the protests against drinking straws and grocery bags, all the way to free speech in general. 

With the passage of time, the perception of the evil corporation has not really changed, though many have made significant concessions to public sensibilities.  What has gone unnoticed is the rise of other corporate behemoths whose reach and negative influence is far more pervasive than those demonized in past generations.  

Without exaggeration, the majority of the world is now subject to the activities of a handful of powerful companies.  Unless you have been living in the deep Amazonian rainforest, your life has been touched by Google, Amazon, Facebook, Netflix,Twitter and Apple.  Together these companies influence virtually every aspect of people’s daily activities.   They all have the same common denominator of providing some form of convenience to a public that needs and craves instant gratification.  This is best expression of capitalism; a need is identified and is addressed by a service.  This continues the legacy of Henry Ford, Eli Whitney and Jacob W. Davis of Levi Strauss fame.  

What’s different about today’s modern behemoths is that they aren’t content just to sell people on products and services.  They are also very much intent on shaping the way people think.  Not happy just to make billons of dollars by selling lifestyle, they are shaping mindsets.  As if they were characters in a Bond film, we have actual real life “Villains” who are controlling the thought processes of hundreds of millions of people. 

The recent announcement by Nike of their new sales campaign posting Colin Kaepernick as their icon, adds that company to the list of mercenary companies that would have been loudly protested back 30 years ago.  To be fair, Nike’s business demographic are younger people, particularly the black demo, who are more likely to sympathize with Kaepernick’s actions.  Older people, less likely to support Kaepernick’s actions are less likely to be customers anyway.  But if this decision is based solely on business, they had every opportunity to propose someone who is of genuinely heroic stature; a guy like Pat Tillman springs to mind.  Some may know that Tillman gave up his professional football career to serve his country by joining the army in the wake of 9-11 and then was tragically killed in action. 

Instead, Nike has chosen to insert their political viewpoint in championing Kaepernick, not in spite of, but because of his protests against the national flag.  He is the Jane Fonda of the modern epoch. 

People once mobilized against what they perceived to be the evilness of large corporations. It’s ironic now that corporations have never been more invasive and manipulative…and no one protests.  It’s much more disturbing that the people currently being celebrated for their actions, are anti-heroes… instead of real ones.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Facebooktwitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

November 16, 2016

Like, Pass It On

Filed under: Culture,Entertainment,Politics — Tags: , , , — TC @ 8:03 am

 

Source: Facebook, Google Crack the Whip on Fake News

Back in the day, if it was on TV or in the newspapers, it must be true.  The modern iteration of this flawed wisdom now is that a story has validity because it was posted on Facebook.

There’s no denying that Facebook has morphed from a quaint social platform where friends posted their activities and kept in touch with distant relatives to become a commercial behemoth generating hundreds of millions of dollars of revenue and becoming the de facto village bulletin board for all types of spam.

For many, Facebook has become a compulsion as people out-do each other with envy invoking pictures of recent vacations or thrilling adventures.  Voyeurs and narcissists alike find reasons to be participants.  Naturally, the sheer size of the worldwide audience begged for commercial capitalization and so ads were introduced into the application and next thing you know, your neighbor’s vacation in Thailand is sponsored by Viagra.

People can post only so many interesting things since, well, most lives are dull punctuated by the occasional vacation episode or rock concert, or baby birth.  Enter the introduction of sponsored links and likes.  Now, users can further embellish their profiles by passing on stories, articles and opinions that they ‘like’, causing their contacts to also ‘like’, much like clapping when someone else starts it.

From liking videos of rescued dolphins,  puppies and cats to passing on interesting recipes for kale, the site became more and more a commercial billboard than personal scrapbook. Running out of original content, people lazily forwarded videos and clever quotes instead.  It became a natural place to distribute faux news under the cover of blessing from the social network.

A recent study revealed that more and more people were getting their news from either Facebook or Twitter, fully 67%, up from only 50% two years ago.  What this may mean is that opinion shapers may not be the mainstream media outlets of years gone by. Stories and opinions may now have to go through the gatekeepers on social media with the largest number of followers.

This is only alarming when you find out that among the people with the largest followers are, Katy Perry, Justin Bieber, Barack Obama, Rhianna, Eminem, Shakira and believe it or not, Michael Jackson.

The Facebook company has denied the distribution of fake news even as they promise to eradicate this practice going forward.  A particularly ironic nugget of science offered recently was a story that claimed that accepting Facebook requests would allow you to live longer. I suspect the global warming crowd are moonlighting in their storytelling.  Next thing you know, décolletage images will get un-likes on user pages.

It’s unlikely that Facebook’s influence on shaping social perceptions will diminish in the foreseeable future since the trend is towards short headlines and soundbites rather than in depth personal analysis.  My guess is that intellectual laziness and the pressure of social conformity will contribute more and more to the naïve population we see today.  The echo chamber of opinions is much like inbreeding.  Convenient at first, but eventually leading to undesirable consequences.

 

Facebooktwitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

« Newer Posts — Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress