As IF Times

link The Years of Shame – NYTimes.com.

Some may be aware of the writings, or more correctly the rantings of Paul Krugmann.  By profession, he is an economist, yet somehow his unhinged opinions on politics is where he derives most of his notoriety these days.   In the most recent missive published in the New York Times, the true depth of his insanity is on full display for the world to see.

Even as the U.S. rightly commemorates the September 11 bombings from ten years ago, Krugmann fires some vile shots at Messrs. Bush and Giuliani for the heinous crime of happening to be in charge when the terrorist acts took place.   He calls them false heroes who capitalized on the incident to aggrandize themselves.  As I’ve said numerous times, everyone is entitled to their opinions, no matter how out of touch with reality they may be.  The greatest benefit of living in a free society is that any and every idiot is allowed a voice.   Only by comparing these opinions with actual facts can  people determine whether or not to listen to these idiots. 

Years ago, a golfer savant named Moe Norman was recognized for his genius in doing one thing; striking a golf ball.  Other than this very narrow area of human achievement, he was essentially unable to communicate with people.  As long as you didn’t expect anything sage from his unintelligible utterances, you could admire his innate skill.  Apart from his ball striking ability, you couldn’t depend on his opinion on whether or not the sun came out much less on a topic of any kind.  Certainly, no one would seek his opinion on the state of fiscal balances in the economy.

Krugmann seems to fall into this same category.  Although a past winner of a Nobel prize in economics, it’s worth noting that Al Gore and Barack Obama are also Nobel winners, so this in itself is not a validation of other-worldy brilliance.  Unlike Mr. Norman, Krugmann has the soapbox of The New York Times to express his nonsense and that’s where it gets evil.  There are those people out there that still think the Times is a legitimate news organization.  Over the past 30 years and increasingly in the past 10, the opinions espoused in that circular are more conspicuously out of sync with reality.  It’s as if they lived in their own delusional bizarro world where reality is an inconvenient nuisance.  To them, gravity is the product of some capitalist monopoly.

There will always be a market for this kind of ‘journalism’, but increasingly, that niche market of leftist drivel is shrinking as subscription levels prove.  According to their own statistics, the Times circulation has fallen to just about 830,000 in 2010,  a decline of 5% from a year ago which was also in decline from the year previous.   When they publish the opinions such as Krugmann’s it serves to marginalize them more and more from sane people.  Even Moe Norman would wince.

link Mass. Senate candidate looks for boost from ‘rock star’ Bill Clinton – Local News Updates – The Boston Globe

Widely seen as a referendum on the current administration, the incumbent Democrats are bringing in the “big guns” to try to rally any waffling democratic voters in the state by-election. The vote should not even be that close given that the Massachusetts seat is as much a Kennedy heirloom as a Democratic stronghold.

Somehow, the natives appear to be a bit restless and the unthinkable has a possibility of happening. They may lose this iconic seat to the Republicans. This is akin to news that Warren Beatty was now sleeping with men. Well, you win some, you lose some I guess, but the strategy of the incumbent party is amusing as well as perplexing.

Because the race is so close, the rock star Bill Clinton and Obama himself are popping in to sway the hesitant. The Barrack and Rock tour will lend badly needed support for the Democrat Coakley. I’m unsure of the logic here. President Clinton is a great humanitarian and still commands audiences everywhere he goes. However, his ignominious exit from office had a lot to do with being a little less than forthright in his versions of events. President Obama is arguably the reason why the electoral race is as close as it is, so another serving of him would not seem to be of help to Coakley. These guys are as useful as body hair at a porn shoot. If we’re just bringing people with recognition to the race, why not bring in Rod Blagojevich?

Politics is a pretty rough contact sport and Bill’s willingness to stump with someone who recently put the knife into his wife’s back as a Presidential contender last year is that hardball game on full display. Winning is the only objective and loyalties are often confused at best, twisted at worst, but always about expedience. It’s just business. But if you have to bring in the “big guns” to a tight race which historically has been a stronghold for your party, MAYBE SOMETHING’S WRONG WITH YOUR POLICIES.

Meanwhile the challenger, Scott Brown, has Rudy Giuliani stumping for him. Isn’t Rudy the guy that once wore a ballgown, wig and full makeup smooching Donald Trump at a roast? If this election is lost to the incumbents it’ll be to a team with a guy who once wore a dress in public! And they say republicans are no fun.