As IF Times The Anti Fake News

February 21, 2026

Tribal Moments

link:  https://www.nbcolympics.com/news/alysa-liu-champion-who-cant-stop-smiling

Image from Getty Images NBC

That people are tribal is not a new revelation; it’s a basic human condition which exists in our DNA for reasons likely linked originally to survival.  We can probably accept that when people were running around in loincloths and bearskins, it was a good idea to side with the people that looked like you and behaved similarly. It provided some degree of safety to be part of a supportive group in an otherwise hostile environment.  You identified with your group.  We all know of the mythic rivalry between the Hatfields and the McCoys, two rival Appalachian  families who feuded for decades just because their names were different.  The families of Romeo and Juliet; same thing.
On a much larger scale, we have always had divisions of populations based on such identifiers as religions, on ethnicity and race,  on regions and nations and also based on ideology. History shows that the consequences of belonging and identifying with one group over another one can be serious and even fatal.   Lots of wars have been fought based on the disputes both between and amongst such factions.

In today’s slightly more civilized world, these tribal instincts are manifest in less consequential but no less heated loyalties.  Much of these tribal urges are now focused on sports. We all know of the rabid fans in the soccer world during the World Cup when national pride is contested on the soccer pitch.  The activities of a nation can come to halt if a given nation’s team is a contender.  Most recently, the huge commercial event known as the Super Bowl was held and partisan supporters of both teams displayed their fanatical devotion by paying exorbitant sums just to be present at the event and to buy and wear the partisan colors.  This despite the fact that the lives of fans would not be affected in any meaningful way at all, regardless if their teams won or lost.  It was just a tribal thing.

At the moment the 2026 Winter Olympics are being held in Italy and this is the proto-typical occasion to show tribal support for your people, which means for the most part, your country.  People identify with these athletes only because they represent their tribe. If their athletes succeed, there is the notion of reflected glory for the fans of the nation, that they too are part of that athlete’s success.  While it’s natural to root for your country, the feats of the athletes have little to do with their nations.  It’s the result of years of dedicated effort to reach their level of competence. With that said, there can be no greater glory than to stand on the medal podium with your nation’s national anthem playing for everyone.  When the American women’s hockey team won their gold medal, they all collectively stood and sang their national anthem. On the other hand, you could see the heartbreak in the faces of the Canadian team who came up short.  It wasn’t just the loss, it was a loss for their nation. People vicariously live through these athletes representing their national pride.   Nationalism and patriotism is still a strong binding tie for most populations which is why we witness so much backlash against the talented skier Eileen Gu who elected to compete for China instead of her native United States.  The exact opposite was the affection for skater Alysa Liu who was unabashedly patriotic for the United States,  a story which is more compelling given that her father is a refugee from China.

Unfortunately this notionally non-partisan world class sporting event is being used more and more as a political billboard for many participants.  Certain among the American contingent have taken to use their 15 minutes of fame to criticize their own nation or to highlight issues that have nothing to do with competitive sports.  The dynamic of the “me me me” mindset has unfortunately made its way into the arena of sports, a venue which is meant only to showcase the best talents of dedicated athletes.  As the Dixie Chicks intoned years ago, ‘just shut up and sing’.

 

 

August 2, 2025

Acceptable Tastes

In 1967, A company named Star-Kist was marketing canned tuna using a cartoon tuna fish named Charlie, with haughty pretentions to elevated cultural tastes.  Charlie aspired to be accepted into the Star-Kist brand.  However, his tuna colleague told him: “Sorry Charlie, Star-Kist doesn’t want tuna with good taste, they want tuna that tastes good”.

American Eagle should steal this sentiment during their present jean marketing campaign with Sydney Sweeney. As most know, Sweeney’s installation as the new poster gal for American Eagle has sparked another manufactured outrage in the perpetually offended community by daring to invoke an attractive blue eyed blonde girl as their brand representative.  Apparently, this has Nazi connotations.  Of course, it doesn’t help that her initials are SS.

As we know, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but over the past 10 years, we have been coerced to not believe our own lyin’ eyes but rather to defer to those with more refined sensibilities to tell us what beauty is. Thus, the standard of beauty in women was a matter of ticking the boxes of socially acceptable traits rather than of being a spontaneous visceral response.  It was a pretty audacious marketing excercise, to make ugly the new norm of beauty.

Thus, there were gigantic billboards in New York City with even more gigantic models advertising lingerie as if to convince people that blob was the new chic. Even Victoria’s Secret, the lingerie brand known for their comely models began to have ads that could have been created by National Wildebeest. Clearly these companies are unclear as to their target audience.  Some advice for women out there:  men prefer whoopee the verb; not the noun.

But it’s not just physical beauty. The gas lighting of the public extends into virtually all domains of modern life.  Kamala Harris was presented as a keen intellectual and her word salad speeches were exalted as brilliant rhetoric. Before her, Barack Obama’s speeches were considered stuff to be put on stone tablets. The screeching bile from the hosts of The View and the recently terminated Colbert Show was lauded as high wit.

The natural appreciation of beauty in all forms is of course a subjective thing.  Only the very weak minded can be convinced that what they observe and which resonates at an animal level is not acceptable…that they need validation of their own senses. Women are their own worst enemies. Even in such obvious cases as beauty contests, they allow transgender males to compete and in at least one case, win.  Thus, men are better at being women….than women? The art world has been enormously effective at this for generations. The unwashed are convinced to believe that appreciation of high art is synonymous with high intelligence when really, it’s massive gas-lighting for the weak minded.  A glaring example of this were two ‘works of art’ which hung in Canada’s national gallery in 1962. Here’s how the media describes one of them, entitled No.1, White and Red:

“….A famous red and white painting displayed in a Canadian museum is No. 1, White and Red by Mark Rothko. This artwork, created in 1962, is part of the collection at the Art Gallery of Ontario. The painting measures 259.1 x 228.6 cm and is noted for its use of color and light, which has been described as transcendent and capable of transporting viewers into another space…”

To be clear, it was literally a red and white stripe on a canvas. Not to be outdone another two color piece was also acclaimed as being high art:

“…Another notable red and white painting is Voice of Fire by Barnett Newman, which is displayed at the National Gallery of Canada. This large-scale acrylic on canvas painting, measuring 540 cm × 240 cm, was commissioned for Expo 67 and has been valued at over $40 million. While Voice of Fire is not strictly red and white, it is a significant work of art in Canada…”

This piece was breathtakingly daring in its use of blue and red instead of just white and red. Clearly if you didn’t appreciate the brilliant nuances of these bi-chromatic works, you were less evolved.

As stated earlier, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder and there’s a lid for every pot.  It becomes preposterous only when people are convinced that their own sense of what’s attractive should be supplanted by the flawed choices of others and are thus normalized.  Don’t be Charlie.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress