As IF Times

Trump won… or Kamala lost?   What’s the difference?  If one steps back and looks at the zeitgeist leading up to the 2024 election, the groundwork had been laid for years, if not decades.

Post the World War 2 era, the United States began its ascent to becoming the world’s top economic and cultural engine.  It was a time of great emerging prosperity and during this era, the US transformed more and more into an urban rather than an agricultural society.  Industrialization drew people into cities and the influence on American culture likewise shifted towards the sensibilities of their inhabitants.

Consumerism became a thing and suddenly, keeping up with the Jones’ also emerged as the great American pursuit.  Endowed with new prosperity, Americans moved even further away from its agricultural roots and children were instead funneled into universities and colleges to fit into the new economy.  What also blossomed during this time was the appetite for entertainment of all kinds. These were the golden days of the newish device of television.  Now, news and opinions could be transmitted nationwide not just in localized regions.  Two regions emerged as major influencers on American culture; New York and California.  What came out of those regions influenced the entire nation.

Politicians, always astute in recognizing opportunities to help themselves, focused much of their political messages in these heavily populated regions, since that’s where the votes were.  As wealth grew, focus on quality of life eclipsed the mundane needs of simple survival.  Self-actualization became the rage and campuses and culture embraced this new cultural direction.  The era of ‘me’ came into being by the mid ‘60’s.  The late 60’s and early 70’s period was scarred by the war in Vietnam.  As a nation, people strongly pushed back against a war which cost the lives of thousands of young men and which seemed to have no relevance to their own lives.

This anti-war contingent was most prevalent on college campuses both for philosophical reasons and for the existential reason of maybe being drafted for war. In tandem with this was the emergence of the civil rights movement which again found fertile ground at college campuses nationwide.  The power of the youth vote emerged and became a significant political voice which politicians had to consider.  Thus, perhaps for the first time in history, the elders had to consider the views of their children.  But having radically different views from their parents was not easy in the early days.  Often these kids were considered brainwashed and rebellious for the sake of being rebellious. In fact this massive pushback against the dictates of the establishment gave rise to a new consciousness about America and its role in the world.  The notion of peace versus war became more and more mainstream and accepted by Americans tired of never ending wars.  The colleges became the conscience of the nation. They collectively concluded that the vision of the establishment was not one that they agreed with.

As the threat of war diminished along with a national draft, other issues began appearing at college campuses now empowered to exert influence.  The kids that were students were now professors teaching the next generation of students. Being bastions of free thought meant that all kinds of divergent views from the mainstream could be explored.  But an interesting thing happened.

While the embracing of free thought was always the foundation of colleges, as time went on, views that were not in accordance with the ‘accepted’ views were not only unacceptable, they were increasingly restricted or forbidden. As we know, much of what is learned at college is carried forward into society at large and supported by media and entertainment.

Thus, we’ve come full circle.  Whereas anti-war activists back in the day were considered outcasts and trouble-makers, on today’s campuses, to express any opposition to LGBT or DEI principles will make you a pariah. Show any skepticism towards Global Warming and you may as well have 3 heads.  Just as anti-war students back in the day were characterized as hippies and communists, any opposition to the woke zeitgeist on college campuses today will have you labelled as fascist right wingers.  To show any support for a traditional nuclear family or to insist that there are only two sexes will be enough to cast you into being a resident of Nutville.

As with many things in nature, the cultural pendulum has reached its zenith.  Kamala Harris was the unfortunate person without a chair when the music stopped.  It was clear that people had had enough of the incoherent utterances on issues with which she had no expertise. It was clear that she represented the very worst of what’s become of American society, someone who had risen to position without any redeeming skills and who represented a set of ideologies antithetical to common sense.  It was clear that her values and those of her celebrity pals were far removed from the values of the majority of Americans, particularly young Americans.  Rather than being an inspiration, many voters preferred to distance themselves from her party’s message.  The most damning event was when Robert Kennedy Jr, whose family is THE iconic stalwart of the Democrats, left the party and condemned them for having morphed completely away from their original foundations.

Sure, lots people of all demographics voted for Trump, but it was just as much a movement away from the radical values of the Left.  Like the college kids of the 60’s the majority of Americans today are now signaling a new consciousness. College campuses can no longer claim to be the barometer of cultural values. Post voting analysis shows that it was the youth vote that swung away from Harris as much as it was towards Trump.  I think it should be noted that people didn’t flock to the Republican party.  Rather, they agreed with Trump’s message.  Some sixty years later, they have calculated collectively again that the vison of the now establishment was not one that they agreed with.  I suspect that younger people were tired of being told what to think and what was acceptable. The woke agenda had morphed into a bizarre and grotesque creature.  Eventually, youth will always question the official narrative, that much is timeless.  Ironically, it was a septuagenarian Trump that empowered them and gave them voice.

Source: New litmus test? Dems demand elimination of ICE amid immigration furor | Fox News

Over the past 10 years, it’s clear to anyone observing the state of political discourse in America that the dignified to and fro from a period long ago has given way to pretty sharp elbowed acrimony by modern participants.   Historically, both of the major US political parties have been characterized as representing their own particular constituencies.  But while the GOP can still be painted as being stodgy conservatives, the Democratic Party has morphed like a melting candle into an unrecognizable blob of discordant principles.

For years, that party liked to be portrayed as the party of inclusion and of the working class average man.  Unfortunately, that characterization is as dated as handlebar mustaches on barkeepers, or for that matter, even the word barkeeper.  In fact, it’s unlikely that the Dems would like to be known as merely representing men; that would be offensive.  They want to include all the sexes: 16 at last count.  You know that animals and plants will be on their radar soon. The Democrats’ main tool of recruitment is the balkanization of the population into identifiable victimized sub groups,  but now they’ve modified their message  to also include those that aren’t even citizens.

As a matter of common sense, if you’re a political party trying to win the hearts and minds of Americans, it seems obvious that your particular vision of America should resonate with a big chunk of the population, representing ‘American values’.  Not only has there been a departure from this logical path, the route now taken is to champion causes and values that are absolutely antithetical to the very notion of America….and in a very unapologetic way.

The most recent surprise victor at an electoral runoff for state representative in New York, Alexandria Cortez, ran unabashedly and proudly as a socialist and has expressed that communism is the end game.  The most shocked person was the defeated incumbent who thought he owned all of the space on the left.  Imagine his surprise at being out lefted.  Clearly, Cortez was able to galvanize a support base with her message of anti establishment sentiments.  It was the usual songsheet of ostracism, racism, unjust laws etc etc that progressive politicos all sing from.

What’s most radical is Cortez’s insistence that ICE, the immigration police force,  be disbanded and borders should be freely open.  While this may seem a reasonable idea for a 28 year old idealist, you’d think that rational voters, whom are presumably older and can see the folly of such a platform, would be resistant.  Picking up a newspaper and reading about Venezuela, or Cuba should have been a reality check.  But no. So much for logic.

What’s more worrisome is the willingness of the Democrats to embrace such radicalism because it can lead to a seat in the House at the expense of the GOP.  It’s the old “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” idea. We see an increased acceptance of political fossils like Mad Maxine Waters calling for public intimidation of political opponents. We observe public calls for violence against non believers by actors and jugglers and assorted media talking heads.  People are not left in peace in public spaces, nor at their homes. Gangs of people threaten people with violence who don’t share their worldview.  Schools at all levels stifle speech and opinions which are not in accordance to progressive sensibilities.  Of course the irony of this fascist behavior even as the left accuse others of fascism is completely lost on them.  The resemblance of their behavior and dogmatically irrational beliefs to a certain militant religious group is uncanny, but again, that irony is missed.

The Democratic Party is going through a period of significant upheaval, a process which the Republican Party itself went through years ago and which is still in process.  But whereas the GOP at its core still champions the values of the founders of the nation, the Democrats seem to have abandoned any classic vision of America, choosing instead to allow the party to pursue a direction that is everything that Americans have historically fought against.  The gulf between the GOP and the Democrats is now enormous.  Choosing between their platforms is like choosing  between chocolate ice cream or earwax. This has come about from years of distorted narrative about the history of the nation and its people from a revisionist education system and buttressed by the media.   It has been exacerbated by the exaggeration of moral relativism and spurious social justice causes.

One of the most prescient authors of our time made many astute observations about the predictability of humans, human nature and especially of governments.  One of these quotes seems apt here: ” The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history”  

It’s unclear whether the election of Cortez will embolden Democratic candidates to be more nakedly militant against a traditional America.  You can bet that tack will be tested on the public, especially in the increasingly radical western states.  We’ll see if the public prefers ice cream or earwax.